I owned and used a Katana for a few years. I sold it about a year ago as I no longer needed it.
I have also owned and/or used a variety of other amps including modelling amps, solid-state, and valve (tube) amps.
I havenāt used the 50XL, but I have seen the videos on it, I have seen what controls it has, and I can read the online manual.
It basically has the same controls and workflow as the Katana, and pretty much every other amp out there:
- turn on
- plug in
- select voice/channel/patch <ā hereās where the complexity often is
- turn up volume
- play
- adjust gain and EQ as needed
- optionally, set level of FX (e.g. reverb)
I struggle to see why any amp with similar controls would be any more or less āplug and playā than any other for basic use cases.
I do think that some modelling amps can be overly complex when it comes to selecting which voice and when selecting simple effects, and Iāve indicated this in the workflow above.
But the Katana isnāt one of these. In fact itās almost the same as the 50XL.
I must admit, I prefer the simplicity of amps which have simple controls and a handful of core voices you can build from, rather than dozens of amp models and patches to wade through. The Katana has such simple controls and 50XL looks extremely similar with a simple baseline set of voices.
Obviously, if you want to ādeep-diveā into the modelling capabilities to explore and tweak onboard effects or specific amp models a simple control layout doesnāt work. This is where the āmenu divingā for many amps comes in, and I dislike that too. But the Katana does not have that.
Yes, the 50XL is a straightforward amp to use but, IMO, no more so than an out-of-the box Katana. The same applies to a lot of other modelling amps, including some from Blackstar which are equally as easy to use.
IMO, there are good reasons to prefer the 50XL over the Katana (or vice versa) but basic ease of use probably isnāt one of them.
Cheers,
Keith