Solo Blues
It’s true that there are a few ways to look at it. If your goal is just to have a lot of fun learning songs with your acoustic guitar, Solo blues is great. You’ll be busy for at least 1 year learning the songs.
After that, Justin says step two is being able to improvise within the context of those songs. Since the songs are about 12 bars you’re encouraged to make little tweaks so the track lasts longer. Instead of lasting 30 seconds, you stretch it to 1, 1.5 minutes or 2 minutes by repeating structures while adding small variations here and there to keep it interesting.
Both courses being connected
That sort of thing becomes a project for, say, your second year of studying the Solo Blues course. However, for the improvisation part, the course assumes you already have a foundation. In my opinion, if you’ve already done Blues Immersion, you’ll grasp the concepts and find it easier. But if you haven’t done Blues Immersion, I think it’s going to be a lot harder to improvise with this material.
At first, I thought the electric world and the acoustic world were two completely separate things, but at the end of the day, it’s still blues. Both use the same theory, the same minor pentatonics, and similar licks. Sure, Blues Immersion focuses heavily on string bends, whereas in acoustic blues, you can take a lick with a big bend and turn it into a slide instead. Some of them won’t sound great in an acoustic solo blues context, but others will work just fine. Blues Immersion is taught in the key of A, while acoustic solo blues is in E, so eventually, you’ll be able to transpose what you learned in A over to E. Some of those ideas will sound cool on an acoustic, and some won’t—you’ll have to figure it out. But once you’ve done both courses, you realize there are massive connections, and they’re way more linked than you might think. It just takes a couple of years to connect those dots; it won’t happen right when you start the course.
Conclusion
Ultimately, if you love the blues and want to understand how it works so you aren’t just playing the exact same 12 bars over and over, you’ll want to do both courses.
But both courses take time.
If your ultimate goal is to have fun learning those acoustic blues songs, you’re better off learning them right away instead of waiting. Because Blues Immersion is a year-long course, plus maybe another year of consolidation, meaning by the time you actually get around to learning those acoustic Solo blues songs and really diving into them, we’re talking about maybe two years in total. And who knows, you might catch the bug and—like me—end up completely falling in love with electric blues and spending all your time on that, still not having had a lot of time to invest into the acoustic course and signing up again for class 5 instead.
The same thing happened to my returning Blimmer friend Dominique @dominique7
So it can definitely lead to a huge detour. Both are super useful, but since your time is limited, it really comes down to: do you want to take a detour or go straight for what interests you most? Ideally, doing both is great, but it’s going to take time before you actually get around to learning all those acoustic blues songs if that’s your true passion. In the long term though, the detour will pay off as you will understand every lick from Solo Blues after studying Blues Immersion.
But…
At the same time, Blues Immersion is a really cool group and live experience, so it would be a shame to miss it.
It’s a lot more motivating to study with a community. That’s a downside to Solo Blues: you’re on your own, and it’s just not the same experience.
I don’t think you can regret taking Blues Immersion. The only thing you might regret is not having enough time left for your other passions, like Jack Johnson, for the next year (or longer) due to the intensive nature of the course. Meanwhile, Solo Blues requires less time investment and is much easier to do on a part-time basis.