The David Gilmour Interview

Just in case you havenā€™t cached thatā€¦ He explains quite a lot about how he produce his musicā€¦

10 Likes

My humble opinion only, and at odds with 99%of comments I scanned on Youtube.

It was a disappointing interview.
Rick was far too reverential and studiously avoided asking or talking about so much that Gilmour fans would be more interested in.

I know Gilmour has struggled as a songwriter but Iā€™m not in the least bit interested in the process his wife or children undertake to write the lyrics.

I donā€™t want Pink Floyd dramas unearthing but 50 + years of Gilmourā€™s musical career was wholly circumvented - seemingly in fear of venturing into awkward territory.

I donā€™t want to know about the extent to which Gilmour has or has not become proficient at using software. I want to know how he learned to play the way he plays, what and who inspired and informed his style, how and when he developed something he himself recognised as his own voice and sound on guitar.

It was nerdy in terms of tech and gear talk. It was focused almost exclusively on his one recent record and tour. It was an opportunity missed.

4 Likes

Thatā€™s very interesting, Richard @Richard_close2u, and it very much mirrors my own thoughts and feelings. Iā€™ve seen some fantastic interviews that Rick Beato has done with other artists, but this one seemed so constrained to the scope you described, and it just wasnā€™t all that interesting. I donā€™t know if that choice was made by Gilmour or Beato, but the outcome was the same either way.

Iā€™ll go even further out the ledge than you did and say that I wonder if maybe Gilmour, whoā€™s known to be a recluse and an introvert, just isnā€™t an ideal interviewee. Iā€™ve seen a handful of other short videos with him talking, and heā€™s never seemed particularly engaged, seeming as if heā€™d rather be doing something else. What he did discuss was technical and dry, much like in this interview. I absolutely donā€™t fault him for being who he is; heā€™s a truly exceptional guitar player, and it would be absurd to expect him to be more than that.

But like you, I had high hopes and felt a bit let down.

I mainly agree with your sentiments (I did not read the comment section though), but I think that was most likely part of the deal to even get him on. No questions about Pink Floyd, no questions about history, etc.

Well, each to their own, Richard. Granted that answers to questions you would have like to have seen Rick Beato ask would have been good to hear. Thereā€™s also perhaps overlap between the terms, ā€œfanā€ and ā€œnerdā€ ā€¦ :thinking:

I thought it was a very interesting interview in-the-round, and Rick seemed to have done some preparation by exploring new and current ground; asking questions that have probably not been asked before in the (very) many interviews with David over many decades.

TIme will tell whether this interview will be a ā€˜go-toā€™ in years to come ā€¦ after he (and perhaps we) are ā€œā€¦ shuffled off this mortal coil ā€¦ā€ :sunglasses:

Been waiting for this and surprised myself by wandering off before it was finished :confused: