If people are wanting to take the time to offer even a little feedback, then that provides a decent summary JK. Critique can fit within those parameters.
And Dave puts it another way … in a phrase I’m familiar with …
That is true and I can immediately think of a few people that would apply to. I would not allow the way feedback is received determine the spirit with which it continues to be offered. Would people stop giving their children gifts at Christmas just because one child didn’t play with toys they received?
In a number of moderator discussions we have always pushed towards the keep-it-simple approach with fewer, not more, categories and sub-categories. There was a recent (ish) rearrangement of some categories. I do not see a circumstance where we will split Community Recordings into further sub-categories.
Check the synopsis given on the AVOYP sub-category.
Well put Lisa. This is where the healthy and virtuous circle of mutual support and pay-it-forward thinking can weave through the Community Recordings … if each and every person who shares a recording gives, say, two other people feedback.
The flow of people who are engaged a lot or a little is an ever changing aspect, naturally and rightly so. So long as the prevailing ethos of the Community is upheld and the positive spirit of giving and sharing is maintained, who offers feedback and who offers encouragement (and who does not for whatever reason) is not the primary consideration. It doesn’t matter who scores if the team wins right ?
Quite so.
Thanks for giving me a chuckle in a serious topic Ian!
Those are some great thoughts on guiding any feedback offered Gordon.
Fair point to which I would add that it can be possible to comment along the lines of (in writing a response to an AVOYP) … ‘check what you’re doing between 1min20 and 2mins, something doesn’t quite sound right, maybe isolate that section, slow it down and improve the chord changes / strumming etc.’
That is an important point. Being self aware is so important. People have commented that hey explicitly ask for feedback when posting. That could be extended to people stating, “I can see and hear that I struggled with the chord changes and fell behind the tempo a few times, is there anything else I missed?”
There’s a win-win and a good result from people sharing recordings.
Stitch, you have been a real trooper of the old forum and this community, the time you give, your generosity and support across all areas is incredible. I would encourage you to make your feedback in the public space as many people on many occasions have said they find value in reading the feedback and critique offered to others.
Such as this …
Dave is referring to Justin’s own description of himself as an absent father. When he first set up a forum allied to his (old) website he interacted much more - the number of members and posts were so much less. He simply does not have time now though knows that it runs according t his guiding principles and the ethos with which he set it up and hoped for it to run continues.
I tend to agree. If an AVOYP elicits, say, twenty replies, the majority are positive and encouraging with just a few containing juicy morsels of perceptive critique and well formed feedback then that is a healthy diet imho.
A really important point to raise Shane. Someone who has literally just burst through the barrier of making 50 one minute changes between E and Am can be the best person to advise a brand new beginner on forming and changing to and from the E and Am chords.